Bus body
Manning August 15, 1
U.S. patent number D302,802 [Application Number 07/018,076] was granted by the patent office on 1989-08-15 for bus body. Invention is credited to Donald L. Manning.
| United States Patent | D302,802 |
| Manning | August 15, 1989 |
Bus body
Claims
The ornamental design for a bus body, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Manning; Donald L. (Orchard Lake, MI) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 07/018,076 |
| Filed: | February 24, 1987 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D12/84 |
| Field of Search: | ;D12/84 ;296/178 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D189745 | February 1961 | Ahrens et al. |
| D248033 | May 1978 | James et al. |
| D255340 | June 1980 | Flesche |
| D291981 | September 1987 | Manning |
| D292195 | October 1987 | Manning |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Reising, Ethington, Barnard, Perry & Milton
Description
FIG. 1 is an elevation view of the passenger entry side of a bus body showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is an enlarged front elevation view thereof;
FIG. 3 is an enlarged rear elevation view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 5 is an elevation view of the driver's side thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 