Mug
Segal August 8, 1
U.S. patent number D302,634 [Application Number 06/934,316] was granted by the patent office on 1989-08-08 for mug. Invention is credited to Paul Segal.
| United States Patent | D302,634 |
| Segal | August 8, 1989 |
Mug
Claims
The ornamental design for a mug, as shown.
| Inventors: | Segal; Paul (White Plains, NY) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/934,316 |
| Filed: | November 24, 1986 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/536 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/9,6,11,13,15,319,20,10,39 ;220/94R,94A |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D258795 | April 1981 | Zamorski |
| D290571 | June 1987 | Rowe |
| 1975241 | October 1934 | Werber et al. |
Other References
|
New Compatibles by Pfaltzgraff, Supplement to HFD, Jan. 15, 1979, Sec. 2, Souper Mug 14 oz., p. 2.. |
Primary Examiner: Herrmann; Winifred E.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Spellman, Jr.; Martin J.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of a mug showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a front elevational view thereof; and
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 