Planter
Heras , et al. July 25, 1
U.S. patent number D302,403 [Application Number 06/882,611] was granted by the patent office on 1989-07-25 for planter. Invention is credited to Diane Heras, George Heras.
| United States Patent | D302,403 |
| Heras , et al. | July 25, 1989 |
Planter
Claims
The ornamental design for a planter, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Heras; George (Tampa, FL), Heras; Diane (Tampa, FL) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/882,611 |
| Filed: | July 7, 1986 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D11/143; D11/152 |
| Field of Search: | ;D11/143,152-154,164,151 ;47/66,79,80 ;D7/29 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D172197 | May 1954 | Rowe |
| D175435 | August 1955 | Moffat |
| D182130 | February 1958 | Luipersbek |
| D217006 | March 1970 | Michalek |
| 2814911 | December 1957 | Shep |
| 0754597 | Aug 1956 | GB | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Monacelli; Walter J.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a planter showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear view thereof, the side views being identical;
FIG. 4 is a bottom view thereof; and
FIG. 5 is a perspective view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 