Fluorescent tube dunnage
Creaden May 9, 1
U.S. patent number D301,013 [Application Number 06/895,509] was granted by the patent office on 1989-05-09 for fluorescent tube dunnage. This patent grant is currently assigned to Lawrence Paper Company. Invention is credited to David E. Creaden.
| United States Patent | D301,013 |
| Creaden | May 9, 1989 |
Fluorescent tube dunnage
Claims
The ornamental design for fluorescent tube dunnage, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Creaden; David E. (Lawrence, KS) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Lawrence Paper Company
(Lawrence, KS) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/895,509 |
| Filed: | August 11, 1986 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/456 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/456,424 ;206/334,418-419,443,420-422,557,564 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2984345 | May 1961 | Emery |
| 3476235 | July 1968 | Mills |
Assistant Examiner: Lieberman; Lucy
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Hovey, Williams, Timmons & Collins
Description
FIG. 1 is a top front perspective view of fluorescent tube dunnage showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear elevation thereof;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof; and
FIG. 4 is a right side elevation thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 