Pendant
Baird April 4, 1
U.S. patent number D300,520 [Application Number 06/838,009] was granted by the patent office on 1989-04-04 for pendant. Invention is credited to Martha P. Baird.
| United States Patent | D300,520 |
| Baird | April 4, 1989 |
Pendant
Claims
The ornamental design for a pendant, as shown.
| Inventors: | Baird; Martha P. (Carrollton, TX) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/838,009 |
| Filed: | February 28, 1986 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D11/79; D11/76; D11/96 |
| Field of Search: | ;D11/2,40-48,53-56,61,75,76,79-81,83,85,88,96,102,131,116,87,30 ;63/1.1,2,23,12-14,8,18-21 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D87434 | July 1932 | Haas |
| D150506 | August 1948 | LeBlanc |
| D197800 | March 1964 | Nolen |
| D260861 | September 1981 | Han |
| D291665 | September 1987 | Tabakian |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: McHugh; Charles W.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the pendant showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a right side elevational view thereof; and
FIG. 7 is a rear side elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 