Puzzle
Pavelle March 21, 1
U.S. patent number D300,334 [Application Number 06/929,951] was granted by the patent office on 1989-03-21 for puzzle. Invention is credited to Richard Pavelle.
| United States Patent | D300,334 |
| Pavelle | March 21, 1989 |
Puzzle
Claims
The ornamental design for a puzzle, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Pavelle; Richard (Winchester, MA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/929,951 |
| Filed: | November 12, 1986 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/478 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/240,104-108 ;273/153R,156,157,153,155,8 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D33364 | October 1900 | Lindemeyer |
| D67463 | June 1925 | Johnson |
| 666022 | January 1901 | Norris et al. |
| 2498074 | February 1950 | Feldman |
| 3813099 | May 1974 | Scott |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sprung Horn Kramer & Woods
Description
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a puzzle showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a right side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof; and
FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view thereof, taken along line 6--6 in FIG. 4.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 