Clock
Booty February 28, 1
U.S. patent number D300,006 [Application Number 06/805,756] was granted by the patent office on 1989-02-28 for clock. This patent grant is currently assigned to Zelco Industries. Invention is credited to Donald J. Booty.
| United States Patent | D300,006 |
| Booty | February 28, 1989 |
Clock
Claims
The ornamental design for a clock, substantially as shown.
| Inventors: | Booty; Donald J. (Frankfort, IL) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Zelco Industries (Mount Vernon,
NY) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/805,756 |
| Filed: | November 18, 1985 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D10/22; D10/30; D10/37; D10/6 |
| Field of Search: | ;D10/22,30-39,37,6 ;368/276-277,280-282,285 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D256560 | August 1980 | van Eyben |
| D276506 | November 1984 | Henkels |
| D289739 | May 1987 | Froidevaux |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Eslinger; Lewis H. Dowden; Donald S.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a clock shading my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view of FIG. 5;
FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view of FIG. 5;
FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a top and left front perspective view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 