Utensil caddy
Pifher February 14, 1
U.S. patent number D299,805 [Application Number 06/879,558] was granted by the patent office on 1989-02-14 for utensil caddy. Invention is credited to Eldon T. Pifher.
| United States Patent | D299,805 |
| Pifher | February 14, 1989 |
Utensil caddy
Claims
The ornamental design for a utensil caddy, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Pifher; Eldon T. (New Washington, OH) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/879,558 |
| Filed: | June 27, 1986 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/641; D6/681.1 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/73 ;D6/417,462,467 ;211/70.7 ;248/37.6,530 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D122170 | August 1940 | McCann |
| 1259623 | March 1918 | Herrick |
| 2754974 | July 1956 | Larson |
| 4467925 | August 1984 | Ratzloff et al. |
Assistant Examiner: Pfeffer; Terry
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Darr; Richard C.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of the utensil caddy showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof; and
FIG. 5 is a front perspective view of a second embodiment of that shown in FIG. 1.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 