Cursor control for computer display
Louis December 27, 1
U.S. patent number D299,141 [Application Number 06/821,961] was granted by the patent office on 1988-12-27 for cursor control for computer display. Invention is credited to William M. Louis.
| United States Patent | D299,141 |
| Louis | December 27, 1988 |
Cursor control for computer display
Claims
The ornamental design for a cursor control for computer display, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Louis; William M. (Encinitas, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/821,961 |
| Filed: | January 24, 1986 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D14/388 |
| Field of Search: | ;D14/100,106,107,114 ;340/365R,700,706,709,710 ;178/18 ;74/471XY ;200/5R,5A,6R,6A ;273/148B ;D21/48 ;D13/12,32,38 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D292927 | November 1987 | Burnstein et al. |
| 4580006 | April 1986 | Hull |
| 4654647 | March 1987 | Wedam |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Brown, Martin, Haller & Meador
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the cursor control for a computer display showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof; and
FIG. 4 is a side elevational view thereof; all sides being identical.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 