Teether
Gorman November 29, 1
U.S. patent number D298,777 [Application Number 06/845,035] was granted by the patent office on 1988-11-29 for teether. This patent grant is currently assigned to Epiphany, Inc.. Invention is credited to Jeffrey B. Gorman.
| United States Patent | D298,777 |
| Gorman | November 29, 1988 |
Teether
Claims
The ornamental design for a teether, as shown.
| Inventors: | Gorman; Jeffrey B. (Los Angeles, CA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Epiphany, Inc. (Los Angeles,
CA) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/845,035 |
| Filed: | March 17, 1986 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/194 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/45 ;128/359,360,62A ;283/904,75 ;D3/61,62,65 ;D18/7 ;D19/9,10 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D160140 | September 1949 | Binney |
| D263999 | April 1982 | Bergman |
| D277031 | January 1985 | Panicci |
Assistant Examiner: Reid; Stella M.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Tolpin; Thomas W.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a teether showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a back elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a right side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 