U.S. patent number D296,952 [Application Number 07/011,673] was granted by the patent office on 1988-08-02 for shoe arch. This patent grant is currently assigned to Reebok International Ltd.. Invention is credited to Paul D. Brown, Juan A. Diaz.
United States Patent | D296,952 |
Brown , et al. | August 2, 1988 |
Inventors: | Brown; Paul D. (Hingham, MA), Diaz; Juan A. (Weymouth, MA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Reebok International Ltd.
(Canton, MA) |
Appl. No.: | 07/011,673 |
Filed: | February 6, 1987 |
Current U.S. Class: | D2/946; D2/977 |
Field of Search: | ;D2/264,274,308-314,317-320 ;36/102,103,106,112-114,132,136,25R,28,32R,59R,59C,91 |
D57110 | February 1921 | Brown |
D157034 | January 1950 | Eldon |
D204186 | March 1966 | Mattos |
D244642 | June 1977 | Famolare |
D251817 | May 1979 | Inohara |
D257647 | December 1980 | Combaret |
D257799 | January 1981 | Combaret |
2557946 | June 1951 | Crooker |
3193950 | July 1965 | Liou |
4137653 | February 1979 | Famolare |
4399621 | August 1983 | Dassler |
4506460 | March 1985 | Rudy |
2812968 | Oct 1978 | DE | |||
Kangaroos Catalog, 6/18/84 (page unknown)--Tennis Shoe NIH-4260 at bottom. . Boot and Shoe Recorder, 1/15/61, p. 78--Kling-Title Bumper Toe.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.