Ring watch
Colvin July 5, 1
U.S. patent number D296,533 [Application Number 06/704,046] was granted by the patent office on 1988-07-05 for ring watch. Invention is credited to Kenneth M. Colvin.
| United States Patent | D296,533 |
| Colvin | July 5, 1988 |
Ring watch
Claims
The ornamental design for a ring watch, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Colvin; Kenneth M. (Charlotte, NC) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/704,046 |
| Filed: | February 21, 1985 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D11/2; D10/2; D11/29 |
| Field of Search: | ;D10/1,2,22,30,31,39,122-126 ;D11/2,29 ;63/15 ;368/10,276-285 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D182342 | March 1958 | Schreiber |
| D194058 | November 1962 | Powers |
| D267859 | February 1983 | Kabaya |
| D277655 | February 1985 | Texidor |
| 1404536 | January 1922 | Maculskiys |
| 2608049 | August 1952 | Wittmayer |
| 282143 | Jul 1952 | CH | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Gernstein; Terry M.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a ring watch showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof; and
FIG. 4 is a side elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 