Ball
Christopherson April 12, 1
U.S. patent number D295,203 [Application Number 06/786,469] was granted by the patent office on 1988-04-12 for ball. Invention is credited to Rollin F. Christopherson.
| United States Patent | D295,203 |
| Christopherson | April 12, 1988 |
Ball
Claims
The ornamental design for a ball, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Christopherson; Rollin F. (South Ogden, UT) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/786,469 |
| Filed: | October 11, 1985 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/707; D6/601 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/204,205 ;D6/601 ;273/58R,58K,58A |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 890920 | June 1908 | Newbold |
| 3887183 | June 1975 | Saso |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Russell; M. Reid
Description
FIG. 1, is the profile perspective view taken from above a horizontal plane of the ball showing my new design;
FIG. 2, is a side elevation view of one side of the ball of FIG. 1, each of the four sides being identical one with the other;
FIG. 3, is a top plan view of the ball of FIG. 1 shown rotated 45 degrees around a vertical axis through the center thereof; and
FIG. 4, is a side elevational view of the ball of FIG. 3.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 