Baseball novelty
Lund March 15, 1
U.S. patent number D294,724 [Application Number 06/814,802] was granted by the patent office on 1988-03-15 for baseball novelty. Invention is credited to Richard G. Lund.
| United States Patent | D294,724 |
| Lund | March 15, 1988 |
Baseball novelty
Claims
The ornamental design for a baseball novelty, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Lund; Richard G. (Brooklyn Park, MN) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/814,802 |
| Filed: | December 30, 1985 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/623; D21/626 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/204,205,155 ;273/58R,6R |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D90044 | May 1933 | Orwitz |
| D90081 | June 1933 | McMahan |
| D142393 | September 1945 | Fisk et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Kinney & Lange
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view as seen from the top, front and side of a baseball novelty, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a view in top plan thereof;
FIG. 3 is a view in bottom plan thereof;
FIG. 4 is a view in side elevation, the side opposite that shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 5 is a view in front elevation thereof; and
FIG. 6 is a view in rear elevation thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 