Brush
Purvis , et al. July 28, 1
U.S. patent number D291,029 [Application Number 06/727,383] was granted by the patent office on 1987-07-28 for brush. Invention is credited to Raymond F. Grout, Grant Harrison, Grant D. Purvis.
| United States Patent | D291,029 |
| Purvis , et al. | July 28, 1987 |
Brush
Claims
The ornamental design for a brush, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Purvis; Grant D. (Miramar, NZ), Grout; Raymond F. (Levin, NZ), Harrison; Grant (Waikanae, NZ) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/727,383 |
| Filed: | April 25, 1985 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D4/118; D32/42; D32/47; D32/49 |
| Field of Search: | ;15/159R,159A,160 ;D4/130-136,118,116 ;D32/40,42,46,47,49 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2857608 | October 1958 | Schwartz |
| 2980936 | April 1961 | Snow et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Ladas & Parry
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a brush showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a front end elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a rear end elevational view thereof;
FIG. 7 is a cross sectional view taken along line 7--7 of FIG. 4.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 