Extrusion
Weilow July 21, 1
U.S. patent number D291,009 [Application Number 06/661,358] was granted by the patent office on 1987-07-21 for extrusion. Invention is credited to Gerth Weilow.
| United States Patent | D291,009 |
| Weilow | July 21, 1987 |
Extrusion
Claims
The ornamental design for an extrusion, substantially as shown.
| Inventors: | Weilow; Gerth (151 49 Sodertalje, SE) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/661,358 |
| Filed: | October 16, 1984 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Apr 17, 1984 [SE] | 84-1276 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D25/120 |
| Field of Search: | ;D25/70,73-78 ;52/239,721,731,733,737,738,740 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D244777 | June 1977 | Bobrovniczky |
| D244942 | July 1977 | Bobrovniczky |
| 3256671 | June 1966 | Handley |
Other References
|
1981 Sweet's Catalog File, vol. 2, Sec. 5.13a/sh, Sharon Ornamental Iron, Inc. Brochure, p. 6, 2" Posts/Half Size, lower center of page.. |
Primary Examiner: Gandy; James M.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Ciotti & Murashige
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an extrusion showing my new design; and
FIG. 2 is an end elevation view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 