Shoulder-stock scope and camera mount
Hedrick July 7, 1
U.S. patent number D290,709 [Application Number 06/726,696] was granted by the patent office on 1987-07-07 for shoulder-stock scope and camera mount. Invention is credited to John D. Hedrick.
| United States Patent | D290,709 |
| Hedrick | July 7, 1987 |
Shoulder-stock scope and camera mount
Claims
The ornamental design for shoulder-stock scope and camera mount, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Hedrick; John D. (San Diego, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/726,696 |
| Filed: | April 23, 1985 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D16/243 |
| Field of Search: | ;D16/10,38,44-47 ;354/293 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D137484 | March 1944 | Swanson |
| D204911 | May 1966 | Adams |
| D211290 | June 1968 | Hardy |
| D224053 | June 1972 | Stein |
| D276620 | December 1984 | Hanke |
| 1972000 | August 1934 | Warner |
| 3105430 | October 1963 | Fernelius |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Charmasson & Holz
Description
FIG. 1 is a top and left rear perspective view of a shoulder-stock scope and camera mount showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a bottom and right front perspective view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 