Display case
Bruget June 9, 1
U.S. patent number D290,204 [Application Number 06/714,577] was granted by the patent office on 1987-06-09 for display case. Invention is credited to Bernard C. Bruget.
| United States Patent | D290,204 |
| Bruget | June 9, 1987 |
Display case
Claims
The ornamental design for a display case, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Bruget; Bernard C. (Tempe, AZ) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/714,577 |
| Filed: | March 21, 1985 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/675.1 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/449,474,477,478,479,480 ;312/114 ;108/92,93,59 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D33761 | December 1900 | McRay |
| D116968 | October 1939 | Thompson |
| D171201 | December 1953 | Fisher |
| D286115 | October 1986 | Evans |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Flickinger; Don J. Meschkow; Jordan M.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a display case showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a reduced-scale top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a side elevational view thereof, the other side being substantially a mirror image thereof; and
FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 