Filament package
Corella May 26, 1
U.S. patent number D289,973 [Application Number 06/672,935] was granted by the patent office on 1987-05-26 for filament package. Invention is credited to Arthur P. Corella.
| United States Patent | D289,973 |
| Corella | May 26, 1987 |
Filament package
Claims
The ornamental design for a filament package, substantially as shown.
| Inventors: | Corella; Arthur P. (North Hollywood, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/672,935 |
| Filed: | November 19, 1984 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/720; D9/707 |
| Field of Search: | ;206/610,63.3,63.5,388,409,390,484 ;D9/305,337 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D285412 | September 1986 | Harwell, Jr. |
| 3163288 | December 1964 | Arvidsson |
| 3315802 | April 1967 | Lonholdt et al. |
| 3815315 | June 1974 | Glick |
| 4116338 | September 1978 | Weichselbaum |
| 4126221 | November 1978 | Cerwin |
| 4168000 | September 1979 | MacRitchie |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Diamond; Donald
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a filament package, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is an end view thereof; and
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 