Electronic dictionary
Echols, Jr. , et al. April 28, 1
U.S. patent number D289,527 [Application Number 06/725,773] was granted by the patent office on 1987-04-28 for electronic dictionary. Invention is credited to Joseph G. Echols, Jr., Joseph G. Echols, Sr..
| United States Patent | D289,527 |
| Echols, Jr. , et al. | April 28, 1987 |
Electronic dictionary
Claims
The ornamental design for an electronic dictionary, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Echols, Jr.; Joseph G. (Detroit, MI), Echols, Sr.; Joseph G. (Detroit, MI) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/725,773 |
| Filed: | April 22, 1985 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D18/7 |
| Field of Search: | ;D18/2,6-8,11 ;364/706-710 ;200/5A |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D249742 | September 1978 | Ohie |
| D251634 | April 1979 | Sulek et al. |
| D263969 | April 1982 | Hirata et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Ferrell; Don E.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of an electronic dictionary showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a left side elevational view, the right side being a mirror image;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view;
FIG. 4 is a front elevational view;
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view; and
FIG. 6 is a perspective view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 