Stapler
Speizer April 21, 1
U.S. patent number D289,366 [Application Number 06/577,078] was granted by the patent office on 1987-04-21 for stapler. Invention is credited to Melvin Speizer.
| United States Patent | D289,366 |
| Speizer | April 21, 1987 |
Stapler
Claims
The ornamental design for a stapler, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Speizer; Melvin (Clifton, NJ) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/577,078 |
| Filed: | February 6, 1984 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D8/49 |
| Field of Search: | ;D8/49,50 ;227/127,128,132 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2569220 | September 1951 | Batten |
| 2617096 | November 1952 | Boroughs |
| 2719296 | October 1955 | Marano |
| 2936456 | May 1960 | Ruskin |
| 3199185 | August 1965 | Lash et al. |
Assistant Examiner: Pfeffer; Terry
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Silverman; Melvin K.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top, front, right side perspective view of a stapler showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a right elevation thereof, the left side being a mirror image of the right side;
FIG. 3 is a front elevation thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevation thereof; and
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 