U.S. patent number D289,155 [Application Number 06/869,263] was granted by the patent office on 1987-04-07 for telephone answering device. This patent grant is currently assigned to AT&T Information Systems. Invention is credited to Richard R. Brooks, David C. Danielson, Jerome M. Gotway, John N. McGarvey, Alvin R. Tilley.
United States Patent | D289,155 |
Brooks , et al. | April 7, 1987 |
Inventors: | Brooks; Richard R. (Greenwood, IN), Danielson; David C. (New Canaan, CT), Gotway; Jerome M. (Indianapolis, IN), McGarvey; John N. (Drexel Hill, PA), Tilley; Alvin R. (Red Bank, NJ) |
---|---|
Assignee: | AT&T Information Systems
(Holmdel, NJ) |
Appl. No.: | 06/869,263 |
Filed: | May 30, 1986 |
Current U.S. Class: | D14/141.1 |
Field of Search: | ;D14/1,2,3,4,5,6,52,57,60 ;179/6.03,6.06,6.09,84VF,6.01 |
D193554 | September 1962 | Severson |
D218751 | September 1970 | Zierhut |
D256689 | September 1980 | McCain |
D272341 | January 1984 | Martinez |
D284854 | July 1986 | Vaillant |
W Bell & Co., 1985 Catalog, .COPYRGT.1984, p. 288, Item 5, Phone-Mate 3000. . Evans Distributors & Jewelers 1984-1985 Catalog, .COPYRGT.1984, p. 306 top of page, Items 1-4. . Bang & Olufsen Brochure, p. 4, Beosystem 1900.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.