Slip nut
Lewis March 24, 1
U.S. patent number D288,902 [Application Number 06/692,400] was granted by the patent office on 1987-03-24 for slip nut. This patent grant is currently assigned to Ray Lewis & Son, Inc.. Invention is credited to Robert H. Lewis.
| United States Patent | D288,902 |
| Lewis | March 24, 1987 |
Slip nut
Claims
The ornamental design for a slip nut, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Lewis; Robert H. (Marysville, OH) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Ray Lewis & Son, Inc.
(Marysville, OH) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/692,400 |
| Filed: | January 18, 1985 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D8/397 |
| Field of Search: | ;D8/397 ;411/427,428,429,430,431 ;285/384,386,390,DIG.901,354 ;D23/40 |
Other References
|
Eaton Book of Fastener Savings Ideas; p. 2; Extra Large Nut (No. 3). . Heyco Cat. 182; .COPYRGT.1982; p. 18; Domed Sealing Nut (left of center).. |
Primary Examiner: Bullock; B. J.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Stebens; Robert E.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of a slip nut showing my new design.
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view thereof.
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof.
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 