U.S. patent number D288,707 [Application Number 06/629,266] was granted by the patent office on 1987-03-10 for water purifier. This patent grant is currently assigned to Nimbus Water Systems, Inc.. Invention is credited to Clement C. Macevicz, Byron J. Mulherin, Jr..
United States Patent | D288,707 |
Macevicz , et al. | March 10, 1987 |
Inventors: | Macevicz; Clement C. (San Diego, CA), Mulherin, Jr.; Byron J. (San Marcos, CA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Nimbus Water Systems, Inc.
(Escondido, CA) |
Appl. No.: | 06/629,266 |
Filed: | July 10, 1984 |
Current U.S. Class: | D23/209 |
Field of Search: | ;D23/1-4,148-149 ;D7/300,415 ;210/94,136,198.1,203-205,244-245,257.1-257.8,282,288,236,294-295,416.1-416.5 |
D230735 | March 1974 | Lents |
D254145 | February 1980 | Wilcock |
D256944 | September 1980 | Fox, Jr. |
3262570 | July 1966 | Gailitis et al. |
3367504 | February 1968 | Westmoreland |
3397790 | August 1968 | Newby et al. |
3662780 | May 1972 | Marsh |
3887463 | June 1975 | Bray |
4218317 | August 1980 | Kirschmann |
4515692 | May 1985 | Chandler et al. |
4545905 | October 1985 | Poe |
Kirschmann Reverse Osmosis Water Purifier Model RO-20 Owners Manual, 1978, Home Pure Water Corp.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.