Airship toy balloon
Jensen February 10, 1
U.S. patent number D288,216 [Application Number 06/579,519] was granted by the patent office on 1987-02-10 for airship toy balloon. Invention is credited to Fritz Jensen.
| United States Patent | D288,216 |
| Jensen | February 10, 1987 |
Airship toy balloon
Claims
The ornamental design for an airship toy balloon, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Jensen; Fritz (DK-9800 Hjorring, DK) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/579,519 |
| Filed: | February 13, 1984 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/440; D21/447 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/84,82,87,88 ;446/220,221,222,224,225 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 3225488 | December 1965 | Goldfarb |
| 3292304 | December 1966 | Wolfe |
| 4125233 | November 1978 | Winker et al. |
| 900310 | Dec 1953 | DE | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Morrison; Thomas R.
Description
FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of an airship toy balloon showing my new design, the opposite side being of identical design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a front elevational view thereof; and
FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 