Toy angelfish
Sato December 23, 1
U.S. patent number D287,384 [Application Number 06/637,231] was granted by the patent office on 1986-12-23 for toy angelfish. This patent grant is currently assigned to Pilot Ink Co., Ltd.. Invention is credited to Akito Sato.
| United States Patent | D287,384 |
| Sato | December 23, 1986 |
Toy angelfish
Claims
The ornamental design for a toy angelfish, as shown.
| Inventors: | Sato; Akito (Aichi, JP) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Pilot Ink Co., Ltd. (Aichi,
JP) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/637,231 |
| Filed: | August 2, 1984 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/599 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/157 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D227914 | July 1973 | Asano |
Other References
|
FAO Schwarz Cat., Fall-Winter, 1974-1975, p. 46, middle left, Items G-H, Fish Twins.. |
Primary Examiner: Feifer; Melvin B.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sughrue, Mion, Zinn Macpeak & Seas
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a toy angelfish showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view thereof; and
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 