Double checkstand
Richins * December 16, 1
U.S. patent number D287,198 [Application Number 06/365,150] was granted by the patent office on 1986-12-16 for double checkstand. This patent grant is currently assigned to Waremart, Inc.. Invention is credited to Robert T. Richins.
| United States Patent | D287,198 |
| Richins | * December 16, 1986 |
Double checkstand
Claims
The ornamental design for a double checkstand, as shown.
| Inventors: | Richins; Robert T. (Boise, ID) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Waremart, Inc. (Boise,
ID) |
| [*] Notice: | The portion of the term of this patent subsequent to April 13, 1996 has been disclaimed. |
| Appl. No.: | 06/365,150 |
| Filed: | April 5, 1982 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/698 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/143,186,402 ;186/59-68 ;312/140.1 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D263771 | April 1982 | Richins |
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a double checkstand embodying my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side elevational view thereof taken from the left of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a front elevational view thereof taken from the front of FIG. 1; and
FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 