Perfume bottle
O'Reilly October 7, 1
U.S. patent number D286,021 [Application Number 06/611,260] was granted by the patent office on 1986-10-07 for perfume bottle. This patent grant is currently assigned to Revlon, Inc.. Invention is credited to J. Michael O'Reilly.
| United States Patent | D286,021 |
| O'Reilly | October 7, 1986 |
Perfume bottle
Claims
The ornamental design for a perfume bottle, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | O'Reilly; J. Michael (Brooklyn, NY) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Revlon, Inc. (New York,
NY) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/611,260 |
| Filed: | May 17, 1984 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/520; D9/544; D9/565 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/367,370,384,403,406,410,411,412 ;215/1R,1C |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D98270 | January 1936 | McIntosh |
| D113862 | March 1939 | Ansell |
| D144500 | April 1946 | Frederics |
| D264434 | May 1982 | Pettengill |
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a perfume bottle showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a view looking from the left of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a view looking from the right of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view;
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view; and
FIG. 6 is a rear elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 