Seat
Lewis February 4, 1
U.S. patent number D282,418 [Application Number 06/501,433] was granted by the patent office on 1986-02-04 for seat. Invention is credited to Sally S. Lewis.
| United States Patent | D282,418 |
| Lewis | February 4, 1986 |
Seat
Claims
The ornamental design for a seat, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Lewis; Sally S. (Los Angeles, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/501,433 |
| Filed: | June 6, 1983 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/381; D6/379 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/379,380,381,371 ;297/232,233 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D254880 | May 1980 | Durney |
| D269232 | June 1983 | Benveniste |
| D277346 | January 1985 | Steinberger |
| D278105 | March 1985 | Ridenovr |
Other References
|
Progessive Architecture, Jan. 1980, p. 75, Chair by Madison.. |
Primary Examiner: Dunkins; Bruce W.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Schwartz; Charles H. Roston; Ellsworth R.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a seat showing my design in the form of a loveseat;
FIG. 2 is a side elevation view;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view; and
FIG. 4 is a front perspective view of the seat shown in the form of an armchair.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 