Novelty sculpture
Levine January 7, 1
U.S. patent number D282,056 [Application Number 06/492,481] was granted by the patent office on 1986-01-07 for novelty sculpture. Invention is credited to Daniel E. Levine.
| United States Patent | D282,056 |
| Levine | January 7, 1986 |
Novelty sculpture
Claims
The ornamental design for a novelty sculpture, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Levine; Daniel E. (Madison, WI) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/492,481 |
| Filed: | May 4, 1983 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D11/157; D10/44 |
| Field of Search: | ;D11/131-133,140,157 ;D21/109,144 ;D10/44 ;D19/97 ;428/13-15 ;368/93 ;272/8N,27N |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D122475 | July 1940 | Weiss |
| D128396 | July 1941 | Lazarus |
| 163851 | June 1875 | Demuth |
| D219832 | February 1971 | Appel et al. |
| 3240007 | March 1966 | Dock et al. |
| 3935702 | February 1976 | Tamada |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Jacobson; Harvey B.
Description
FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of a novelty sculpture showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof; and
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof.
The novelty sculpture is substantially identical in appearance when viewed from any side.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 