Pistol telescope mount
Bechtel December 17, 1
U.S. patent number D281,804 [Application Number 06/521,099] was granted by the patent office on 1985-12-17 for pistol telescope mount. Invention is credited to Daniel L. Bechtel.
| United States Patent | D281,804 |
| Bechtel | December 17, 1985 |
Pistol telescope mount
Claims
The ornamental design for a pistol telescope mount, as shown.
| Inventors: | Bechtel; Daniel L. (Fort Worth, TX) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/521,099 |
| Filed: | August 8, 1983 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D22/108 |
| Field of Search: | ;D22/7,8 ;42/1.5T ;33/245 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D209049 | October 1967 | Holden |
| D248309 | June 1978 | Weast |
| D257564 | November 1980 | Weast |
| 4026055 | May 1977 | Weast |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: McHugh; Charles W.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a "pistol telescope mount" showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a left elevational side view thereof; and
FIG. 7 is a right elevational side view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 