Bottle
Lane April 30, 1
U.S. patent number D278,599 [Application Number 06/359,533] was granted by the patent office on 1985-04-30 for bottle. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Drackett Company. Invention is credited to James Lane.
| United States Patent | D278,599 |
| Lane | April 30, 1985 |
Bottle
Claims
The ornamental design for a bottle, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Lane; James (Unionville, CA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | The Drackett Company
(Cincinnati, OH) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/359,533 |
| Filed: | March 18, 1982 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/529; D9/558 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/377,403,413,409,389 ;215/1R,1C |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D176226 | November 1955 | Morris |
| D189460 | December 1960 | Richter |
| D211933 | August 1968 | Horne |
| D214426 | June 1969 | Osborn |
| D217333 | April 1970 | Weckman |
| D217334 | April 1970 | Weckman |
| D252794 | September 1979 | Lucas |
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a bottle showing my new design, the opposite side being substantially the same in appearance;
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view looking from the right of FIG. 1;
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 