Ratchet wrench socket unit nut ejector spring retainer
Lye April 30, 1
U.S. patent number D278,594 [Application Number 06/403,558] was granted by the patent office on 1985-04-30 for ratchet wrench socket unit nut ejector spring retainer. Invention is credited to Howard D. Lye.
| United States Patent | D278,594 |
| Lye | April 30, 1985 |
Ratchet wrench socket unit nut ejector spring retainer
Claims
The ornamental design for a ratchet wrench socket nut ejector spring retainer, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Lye; Howard D. (Riverton, WY) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/403,558 |
| Filed: | July 30, 1982 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D8/25; D8/382; D8/499 |
| Field of Search: | ;D8/25,382,499,394,395 ;81/18R,185,DIG.6,DIG.11,177G,18R,60 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 294413 | March 1884 | Stanton |
| 3638519 | February 1972 | Rebold |
| 2041272 | Sep 1980 | GB | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Wymore; Max L.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the ratchet wrench socket nut ejector spring retainer showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side view in elevation with the opposite side being a mirror image;
FIG. 3 is a top view thereof; and,
FIG. 4 is a bottom view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 