Boot
Korn March 26, 1
U.S. patent number D278,091 [Application Number 06/397,508] was granted by the patent office on 1985-03-26 for boot. Invention is credited to Lorelei Korn.
| United States Patent | D278,091 |
| Korn | March 26, 1985 |
Boot
Claims
The ornamental design for a boot, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Korn; Lorelei (Los Angeles, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/397,508 |
| Filed: | July 12, 1982 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/912 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/264,324 ;36/1,1.5,3R,3A,83-93 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D101106 | September 1936 | Cohen |
| D113057 | January 1939 | Calderazzo |
| D117103 | October 1939 | Maling |
| D127118 | May 1941 | Wood |
| D127119 | May 1941 | Wood |
Other References
|
Das ABC Der Schuh--Fabrication, 2/10/1933, p. 210.. |
Primary Examiner: Zarfas; Louis S.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Rozsa; Thomas I.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a boot showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear elevational view;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view;
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view of a boot showing my new design;
FIG. 5 is a left side elevational view;
FIG. 6 is a right side elevational view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 