U.S. patent number D276,905 [Application Number 06/372,262] was granted by the patent office on 1984-12-25 for vehicle tire. This patent grant is currently assigned to Bridgestone Tire Company Limited. Invention is credited to Akira Inoue, Hiroshi Kojima, Hideaki Nishio, Yuji Sakamaki.
United States Patent | D276,905 |
Nishio , et al. | December 25, 1984 |
**Please see images for: ( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
Inventors: | Nishio; Hideaki (Saitama, JP), Kojima; Hiroshi (Tokyo, JP), Inoue; Akira (Tokyo, JP), Sakamaki; Yuji (Tokyo, JP) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Bridgestone Tire Company
Limited (Tokyo, JP) |
Appl. No.: | 06/372,262 |
Filed: | April 26, 1982 |
Oct 27, 1981 [JP] | 56-47511 | |||
Current U.S. Class: | D12/600 |
Field of Search: | ;D12/141-143,146-148 ;152/29R,29NT,29D |
1981 Tread Design Guide, p. 40, General Jet Radial Tire, second tire in from bottom right side of page. . Modern Tire Dealer, Mid. Sep. 1981, p. 78, Tigar TG 505 Tire, center left side of page. . 1981 Tread Design Guide, p. 68, Road King Widetrack Radial Outline-70 Tire, second row down right side of page. . Road & Track, 4/76, p. 80, Continental TS 772 Tire, top left side of page.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.