Toy celery
Paczko December 4, 1
U.S. patent number D276,636 [Application Number 06/431,656] was granted by the patent office on 1984-12-04 for toy celery. This patent grant is currently assigned to Questor Corp.. Invention is credited to Terry Paczko.
| United States Patent | D276,636 |
| Paczko | December 4, 1984 |
Toy celery
Claims
The ornamental design for a toy celery, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Paczko; Terry (Cleveland, OH) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Questor Corp. (Tampa,
FL) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/431,656 |
| Filed: | September 30, 1982 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/623; D21/628 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/155,64,65 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D146132 | December 1946 | Curran |
Other References
|
McCall's Novelty and Needle Work Patterns, Jan., 1960, p. 165, bottom, Celery Figure. . Kiddie Products, The First Years, p. 7, Playthings Group, No. 2013 Items.. |
Primary Examiner: Feifer; Melvin B.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Bahr; Donald R.
Description
FIG. 1 is a left perspective view of a toy celery showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a right perspective view thereof; and
FIG. 3 is a bottom perspective view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 