Tripod
Mooney December 4, 1
U.S. patent number D276,622 [Application Number 06/442,853] was granted by the patent office on 1984-12-04 for tripod. This patent grant is currently assigned to Quick-Set, Incorporated. Invention is credited to Paul C. Mooney.
| United States Patent | D276,622 |
| Mooney | December 4, 1984 |
Tripod
Claims
The ornamental design for the tripod, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Mooney; Paul C. (Northbrook, IL) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Quick-Set, Incorporated
(Northbrook, IL) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/442,853 |
| Filed: | November 18, 1982 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D16/244 |
| Field of Search: | ;D16/44-46 ;248/168-171,177 ;D10/66 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 821052 | May 1906 | McLeod |
| 821335 | May 1906 | Butler |
| 2668682 | February 1954 | Dalton |
| 858713 | May 1940 | FR | |||
| 9518 | 1888 | GB | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Wood, Dalton, Phillips, Mason & Rowe
Description
FIG. 1 is a typical perspective view of a tripod showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a typical fragmentary elevational view of the rear of the tripod leg;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view of a leg as taken from line 3--3 of FIG. 1.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 