Suspendable bottle rack
Moore September 25, 1
U.S. patent number D275,626 [Application Number 06/276,677] was granted by the patent office on 1984-09-25 for suspendable bottle rack. Invention is credited to Aric W. Moore.
| United States Patent | D275,626 |
| Moore | September 25, 1984 |
Suspendable bottle rack
Claims
The ornamental design for a suspendable bottle rack, as shown.
| Inventors: | Moore; Aric W. (Beltsville, MD) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/276,677 |
| Filed: | June 25, 1981 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/708; D6/675.1 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/71 ;D6/113,132,136,189,85,172,175,157 ;211/74,113 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D119582 | March 1940 | Williams et al. |
| D200488 | March 1965 | Watson |
| D237729 | November 1975 | Coppa |
| 349255 | September 1886 | Jackson |
| 1833081 | November 1931 | Kilmer |
| 4327836 | May 1982 | Okuno |
Assistant Examiner: Vales; Carmen H.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a suspendable bottle rack showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof; and
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 