End closure for a container
Brown , et al. September 4, 1
U.S. patent number D275,373 [Application Number 06/337,537] was granted by the patent office on 1984-09-04 for end closure for a container. This patent grant is currently assigned to Ermal C. Fraze. Invention is credited to Omar L. Brown, Jack L. Kalter.
| United States Patent | D275,373 |
| Brown , et al. | September 4, 1984 |
End closure for a container
Claims
The ornamental design for an end closure for a container, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Brown; Omar L. (Kettering, OH), Kalter; Jack L. (Kettering, OH) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Fraze; Ermal C. (Dayton,
OH) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/337,537 |
| Filed: | January 7, 1982 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/438 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/438,434 ;220/270,272,273,268,269 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D263802 | April 1982 | Fraze |
| D263803 | April 1982 | Fraze |
| D265463 | July 1982 | Hazegawa |
| D266991 | November 1982 | Hasegawa et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Beehler, Pavitt, Siegemund, Jagger & Martella
Description
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of an end closure for a container showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a medial sectional view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 