Swing seat
Budde May 22, 1
U.S. patent number D273,967 [Application Number 06/241,438] was granted by the patent office on 1984-05-22 for swing seat. This patent grant is currently assigned to Urethane Roller Specialists, Inc.. Invention is credited to Donald F. Budde.
| United States Patent | D273,967 |
| Budde | May 22, 1984 |
Swing seat
Claims
The ornamental design for swing seat, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Budde; Donald F. (St. Louis, MO) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Urethane Roller Specialists,
Inc. (Eureka, MO) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/241,438 |
| Filed: | March 6, 1981 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/825; D6/351; D6/707.13; D6/716.1 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/242-246,27,18,204,53 ;273/247,85R ;272/85,113 ;D6/209,210,213,202,11,12,32 ;D7/45 ;D11/172 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D265473 | July 1982 | Ornatek |
| 3130969 | April 1964 | Groth |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Polster, Polster and Lucchesi
Description
FIG. 1 is a view in perspective of a swing seat, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a view in side elevation thereof; and
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 