Pupil'desk
Halme March 27, 1
U.S. patent number D273,163 [Application Number 06/246,737] was granted by the patent office on 1984-03-27 for pupil'desk. Invention is credited to Matti Halme.
| United States Patent | D273,163 |
| Halme | March 27, 1984 |
Pupil'desk
Claims
The ornamental design for a pupil's desk, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Halme; Matti (SF-02110 Espoo 10, FI) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/246,737 |
| Filed: | March 23, 1981 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Oct 1, 1980 [FI] | 712/80 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/655.19 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/27,156,175,177-179,181 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D47448 | June 1915 | Bashelier |
| D193559 | September 1962 | Barnes |
| D216710 | March 1970 | Lambert et al. |
| D235834 | July 1975 | Payne et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Andrus, Sceales, Starke & Sawall
Description
FIG. 1 is a front side elevation of a pupil's desk;
FIG. 2 is a back side elevation of a pupil's desk;
FIG. 3 is a sectional view through the top of FIG. 1 looking downwardly;
FIG. 4 is a fragmentary view taken along the line 4--4 of FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view taken along the line 5--5 of FIG. 4.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 