Desk tray
Martin May 17, 1
U.S. patent number D269,017 [Application Number 06/158,826] was granted by the patent office on 1983-05-17 for desk tray. This patent grant is currently assigned to Oxford Pendaflex Canada Limited. Invention is credited to Tom J. Martin.
| United States Patent | D269,017 |
| Martin | May 17, 1983 |
Desk tray
Claims
The ornamental design for a desk tray, as shown.
| Inventors: | Martin; Tom J. (North Delta, CA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Oxford Pendaflex Canada Limited
(Mississauga, CA) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/158,826 |
| Filed: | June 12, 1980 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D19/92 |
| Current International Class: | D1902 |
| Field of Search: | ;D19/92 ;D34/40,42 ;206/503,505-511 ;211/126 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D217790 | June 1970 | Oddo |
| D220014 | February 1971 | Rome et al. |
| D260102 | August 1981 | Evans |
| 3533512 | October 1970 | Serwer |
| 873707 | Jun 1971 | CA | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Ridout & Maybee
Description
FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of a desk tray showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a bottom rear perspective view thereof; and
FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 