Tire
Hammond May 17, 1
U.S. patent number D269,003 [Application Number 06/263,653] was granted by the patent office on 1983-05-17 for tire. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Invention is credited to Philip S. Hammond.
| United States Patent | D269,003 |
| Hammond | May 17, 1983 |
Tire
Claims
The ornamental design for a tire, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Hammond; Philip S. (Akron, OH) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company (Akron, OH) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/263,653 |
| Filed: | May 14, 1981 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D12/583 |
| Current International Class: | D1215 |
| Field of Search: | ;D12/141-143,146-151 ;152/29R,29NT,29WT,29D |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D261493 | October 1981 | Baus et al. |
| D265184 | June 1982 | Hammond |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Pincelli; Frank
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a tire showing the new design, it being understood that the tread pattern is repeated throughout the circumference of the tire; and
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view thereof the opposite side being substantially the same as that shown.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 