Book holder
Fischer December 21, 1
U.S. patent number D267,298 [Application Number 06/199,486] was granted by the patent office on 1982-12-21 for book holder. Invention is credited to Milton Fischer.
| United States Patent | D267,298 |
| Fischer | December 21, 1982 |
Book holder
Claims
The ornamental design for a book holder, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Fischer; Milton (New York, NY) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/199,486 |
| Filed: | October 22, 1980 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D19/34.1 |
| Current International Class: | D0604 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/1,85,181,184,185,180 ;211/10,11,42,43 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D184900 | April 1959 | Von Meyer |
| D187378 | March 1960 | Allen |
| D190501 | June 1961 | Von Meyer |
| D253625 | December 1979 | Davis |
Assistant Examiner: Vales; Carmen H.
Description
FIG. 1 is a reduced perspective view of a book holder showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a right end elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a left end elevational view thereof; and
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 