Golf aid glove
Kneisley December 7, 1
U.S. patent number D267,129 [Application Number 06/206,047] was granted by the patent office on 1982-12-07 for golf aid glove. Invention is credited to Rick A. Kneisley.
| United States Patent | D267,129 |
| Kneisley | December 7, 1982 |
Golf aid glove
Claims
The ornamental design for a golf aid glove, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Kneisley; Rick A. (Humble, TX) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/206,047 |
| Filed: | November 12, 1980 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D29/113 |
| Current International Class: | D0206 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/360,361,27 ;2/161A,162 ;D24/49 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 632547 | September 1899 | Barth |
| 2769179 | November 1956 | Love |
| 3421160 | January 1969 | Domenico |
Other References
|
Bowling, Dec. 1974, p. 7, "Dual Control" Glove, bottom left of page.. |
Primary Examiner: Stearman; Joel
Assistant Examiner: Vales; Carmen H.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Bargfrede; James A.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of the golf aid glove showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a bottom perspective view thereof.
The broken lines on the glove indicate stitching.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 