Set of chess pieces
Shyu August 31, 1
U.S. patent number D266,012 [Application Number 06/081,630] was granted by the patent office on 1982-08-31 for set of chess pieces. Invention is credited to Mingder Shyu.
| United States Patent | D266,012 |
| Shyu | August 31, 1982 |
Set of chess pieces
Claims
The ornamental design for a set of chess pieces, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Shyu; Mingder (Fremont, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/081,630 |
| Filed: | October 4, 1979 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/389 |
| Current International Class: | D2101 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/51,52 ;273/250,253,255,262,288 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D172810 | August 1954 | Sellers |
| D174817 | May 1955 | Kenyon |
Other References
|
Tower Mfg. & Novelty Co. Cat., 1899, p. 247, middle, Staunton Chess Set.. |
Primary Examiner: Feifer; Melvin B.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Katayama; Yoshio
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a set of chess pieces, showing my new design.
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view of the set of chess pieces illustrated in FIG. 1.
The one side of the pieces is shown and the pieces have an identical appearance on the opposite side, not shown.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 