Bottle
Groark June 15, 1
U.S. patent number D264,937 [Application Number 06/163,575] was granted by the patent office on 1982-06-15 for bottle. This patent grant is currently assigned to Seagram United Kingdom Limited. Invention is credited to James B. Groark.
| United States Patent | D264,937 |
| Groark | June 15, 1982 |
Bottle
Claims
The ornamental design for a bottle, as shown.
| Inventors: | Groark; James B. (London, GB2) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Seagram United Kingdom Limited
(GB3) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/163,575 |
| Filed: | June 27, 1980 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/500 |
| Current International Class: | D0901 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/349-355,389,390 ;215/1R,1C |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D80793 | March 1930 | Kositchek |
| D117266 | October 1939 | Gerhart |
| D181056 | September 1957 | Jenkins |
| D223437 | April 1972 | Lluch |
| D253337 | November 1979 | Bass et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Kane, Dalsimer, Kane, Sullivan and Kurucz
Description
FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of a bottle showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a bottom perspective view;
FIG. 3 is an elevational view;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view; and
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 