Candle holder
Meyer May 11, 1
U.S. patent number D264,385 [Application Number 06/104,955] was granted by the patent office on 1982-05-11 for candle holder. Invention is credited to Gene Meyer.
| United States Patent | D264,385 |
| Meyer | May 11, 1982 |
Candle holder
Claims
The ornamental design for a candle holder, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Meyer; Gene (Centerport, NY) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/104,955 |
| Filed: | December 18, 1979 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D26/9 |
| Current International Class: | D2604 |
| Field of Search: | ;D26/9,10,11,12,20-23 ;431/125,126,288,289,291,296,297 ;248/511,519,530 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D227798 | July 1973 | Anderson |
| 2747393 | May 1956 | Thorn |
| 366026 | Dec 1922 | DE2 | |||
| 958124 | Sep 1949 | FR | |||
| 17205 of | 1898 | GB | |||
Other References
|
House Beautiful, 2-1960, p. 43, "Torch Bearer", Candleholders.. |
Primary Examiner: Lucas; Susan J.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Loveman; Edward H.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top view of a candle holder showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof; and
FIG. 3 is a bottom view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 