Combined newspaper and book holder
Rule April 27, 1
U.S. patent number D264,032 [Application Number 06/099,327] was granted by the patent office on 1982-04-27 for combined newspaper and book holder. Invention is credited to Robert J. Rule.
| United States Patent | D264,032 |
| Rule | April 27, 1982 |
Combined newspaper and book holder
Claims
The ornamental design for a combined newspaper and book holder, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Rule; Robert J. (Kansas City, MO) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/099,327 |
| Filed: | December 3, 1979 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/313; D19/91 |
| Current International Class: | D0606; D1902 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/180,184 ;D19/91 ;248/441R,441D,460,175 ;211/42,43,181 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 1197351 | September 1916 | Dalglish |
| 1289644 | December 1918 | Burnett |
| 2441932 | May 1948 | Curry |
| 18380 of | 1910 | GB | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lowe, Kokjer, Kircher, Wharton & Bowman
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a combined newspaper and book holder showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof; and
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 