Shoe sole
Railton April 6, 1
U.S. patent number D263,646 [Application Number 06/142,068] was granted by the patent office on 1982-04-06 for shoe sole. This patent grant is currently assigned to Jungle Feet. Invention is credited to Jeremy J. Railton.
| United States Patent | D263,646 |
| Railton | April 6, 1982 |
Shoe sole
Claims
The ornamental design for a shoe sole, substantially as shown.
| Inventors: | Railton; Jeremy J. (Los Angeles, CA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Jungle Feet (Los Angeles,
CA) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/142,068 |
| Filed: | April 21, 1980 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/952 |
| Current International Class: | D0204 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/319,320,321,264,278,279,327,317 ;36/32R,24.5,25R,59C |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D48040 | October 1915 | Phillips |
| D247832 | May 1978 | Glassgow |
| 3402485 | September 1968 | McMorrow |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Fulwider, Patton, Rieber, Lee & Utecht
Description
FIG. 1 is a bottom plan view of a shoe sole showing my new design; and
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view thereof, the broken line showing of a shoe is environmental and forms no part of the claimed design.
The top of the sole, not shown, is conventional.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 